Rev 947 | Blame | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | Download | RSS feed
\name{attenu}\title{The Joyner-Boore Attenuation Data}\usage{data(attenu)}\alias{attenu}\format{A dataframe with 182 observations on 5 variables.\tabular{rlll}{[,1] \tab event \tab numeric \tab Event Number \cr[,2] \tab mag \tab numeric \tab Moment Magnitude \cr[,3] \tab station \tab factor \tab Station Number \cr[,4] \tab dist \tab numeric \tab Station-hypocenter distance (km)\cr[,5] \tab accel \tab numeric \tab Peak acceleration (g)\cr}}\source{Joyner, W.B., D.M. Boore and R.D. Porcella (1981). Peak horizontalacceleration and velocity from strong-motion records includingrecords from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake. USGSOpen File report 81-365. Menlo Park, Ca.}\description{This data gives peak accelerations measured at various observationstations for 23 earthquakes in California. The data have been usedby various workers to estimate the attenuating affect of distanceon ground acceleration.}\references{Boore, D.M. and W.B. Joyner (1982). The empirical prediction ofground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, S269-S268.Bolt B.A. and N.A. Abrahamson (1982). New attenuation relationsfor peak and expected accelerations of strong ground motion, Bull.Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 2307-2321.Bolt B.A. and N.A. Abrahamson (1983). Reply to W.B. Joyner andD.M. Boore's "Comments on `new attenuation relations for peak andexpected accelerations for peak and expected accelerations of strongground motion'", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73 , 1481-1483.Brillinger, D.R. and H.K. Preisler (1984). An exploratory analysisof the Joyner-Boore attenuation data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74,1441-1449.Brillinger, D.R. and H.K. Preisler (1984). Further analysis ofthe Joyner-Boore attenuation data, Manuscript.}\keyword{datasets}