Rev 27733 | Blame | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | Download | RSS feed
\name{Logic}\title{Logical Operators}\usage{! xx & yx && yx | yx || yxor(x, y)}\alias{!}\alias{&}\alias{&&}\alias{|}\alias{||}\alias{xor}\alias{Logic}\description{These operators act on logical vectors.}\arguments{\item{x, y}{logical vectors, or objects which can be coerced to suchor for which methods have been written.}}\details{\code{!} indicates logical negation (NOT).\code{&} and \code{&&} indicate logical AND and \code{|} and \code{||}indicate logical OR. The shorter form performs elementwisecomparisons in much the same way as arithmetic operators. The longerform evaluates left to right examining only the first element of eachvector. Evaluation proceeds only until the result is determined. Thelonger form is appropriate for programming control-flow and typicallypreferred in \code{\link{if}} clauses.\code{xor} indicates elementwise exclusive OR.Numeric and complex vectors will be coerced to logical values, withzero being false and all non-zero values being true.The operators \code{!}, \code{&} and \code{|} are generic functions:methods can be written for them individually or via the\code{\link{Ops}}) group generic function.\code{\link{NA}} is a valid logical object. Where a component of\code{x} or \code{y} is \code{NA}, the result will be \code{NA} if theoutcome is ambiguous. In other words \code{NA & TRUE} evaluates to\code{NA}, but \code{NA & FALSE} evaluates to \code{FALSE}. See theexamples below.}\references{Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M. and Wilks, A. R. (1988)\emph{The New S Language}.Wadsworth \& Brooks/Cole.}\seealso{\code{\link{TRUE}} or \code{\link{logical}}.\code{\link{Syntax}} for operator precedence.}\examples{y <- 1 + (x <- rpois(50, lambda=1.5) / 4 - 1)x[(x > 0) & (x < 1)] # all x values between 0 and 1if (any(x == 0) || any(y == 0)) "zero encountered"## construct truth tables :x <- c(NA, FALSE, TRUE)names(x) <- as.character(x)outer(x, x, "&")## AND tableouter(x, x, "|")## OR table}\keyword{logic}