| Line 21... |
Line 21... |
| 21 |
The advantage of \code{.Primitive} over \code{\link{.Internal}}
|
21 |
The advantage of \code{.Primitive} over \code{\link{.Internal}}
|
| 22 |
functions is the potential efficiency of argument passing, and that
|
22 |
functions is the potential efficiency of argument passing, and that
|
| 23 |
positional matching can be used where desirable, e.g. in
|
23 |
positional matching can be used where desirable, e.g. in
|
| 24 |
\code{\link{switch}}. For more details, see the \sQuote{R Internals
|
24 |
\code{\link{switch}}. For more details, see the \sQuote{R Internals
|
| 25 |
Manual}.
|
25 |
Manual}.
|
| 26 |
|
26 |
|
| 27 |
All primitive functions are in the base namespace.
|
27 |
All primitive functions are in the base namespace.
|
| 28 |
|
28 |
|
| 29 |
This function is almost never used: \code{`name`} or, more carefully,
|
29 |
This function is almost never used: \code{`name`} or, more carefully,
|
| 30 |
\code{\link{get}(name, envir = baseenv())} work equally well and do
|
30 |
\code{\link{get}(name, envir = baseenv())} work equally well and do
|
| 31 |
not depend on knowing which functions are primitive (which does change
|
31 |
not depend on knowing which functions are primitive (which does change
|