Rev 70340 | Blame | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | Download | RSS feed
### Tests of complex arithemetic.Meps <- .Machine$double.eps## complexz <- 0i ^ (-3:3)stopifnot(Re(z) == 0 ^ (-3:3))## powers, including complex onesa <- -4:12m <- outer(a +0i, b <- seq(-.5,2, by=.5), "^")dimnames(m) <- list(paste(a), "^" = sapply(b,format))round(m,3)stopifnot(m[,as.character(0:2)] == cbind(1,a,a*a),# latter were only approximateall.equal(unname(m[,"0.5"]),sqrt(abs(a))*ifelse(a < 0, 1i, 1),tolerance = 20*Meps))## 2.10.0-2.12.1 got z^n wrong in the !HAVE_C99_COMPLEX casez <- 0.2853725+0.3927816iz2 <- z^(1:20)z3 <- z^-(1:20)z0 <- cumprod(rep(z, 20))stopifnot(all.equal(z2, z0), all.equal(z3, 1/z0))## was z^3 had value z^2 ....## fft():for(n in 1:30) cat("\nn=",n,":", round(fft(1:n), 8),"\n")## polyroot():stopifnot(abs(1 + polyroot(choose(8, 0:8))) < 1e-10)# maybe smaller..## precision of complex numberssignif(1.678932e80+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-300+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-302+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-303+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-304+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-305+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-306+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-307+0i, 5)signif(1.678932e-308+0i, 5)signif(1.678932-1.238276i, 5)signif(1.678932-1.238276e-1i, 5)signif(1.678932-1.238276e-2i, 5)signif(1.678932-1.238276e-3i, 5)signif(1.678932-1.238276e-4i, 5)signif(1.678932-1.238276e-5i, 5)signif(8.678932-9.238276i, 5)## prior to 2.2.0 rounded real and imaginary parts separately.## Complex Trig.:abs(Im(cos(acos(1i))) - 1) < 2*Mepsabs(Im(sin(asin(1i))) - 1) < 2*Meps##P (1 - Im(sin(asin(Ii))))/Meps##P (1 - Im(cos(acos(Ii))))/Mepsabs(Im(asin(sin(1i))) - 1) < 2*Mepsall.equal(cos(1i), cos(-1i)) # i.e. Im(acos(*)) gives + or - 1i:abs(abs(Im(acos(cos(1i)))) - 1) < 4*Mepsset.seed(123) # want reproducible outputIsi <- Im(sin(asin(1i + rnorm(100))))all(abs(Isi-1) < 100* Meps)##P table(2*abs(Isi-1) / Meps)Isi <- Im(cos(acos(1i + rnorm(100))))all(abs(Isi-1) < 100* Meps)##P table(2*abs(Isi-1) / Meps)Isi <- Im(atan(tan(1i + rnorm(100)))) #-- tan(atan(..)) does NOT work (Math!)all(abs(Isi-1) < 100* Meps)##P table(2*abs(Isi-1) / Meps)set.seed(123)z <- complex(real = rnorm(100), imag = rnorm(100))stopifnot(Mod ( 1 - sin(z) / ( (exp(1i*z)-exp(-1i*z))/(2*1i) )) < 20 * Meps)## end of moved from complex.Rd## PR#7781## This is not as given by e.g. glibc on AMD64(z <- tan(1+1000i)) # 0+1i from R's own code.stopifnot(is.finite(z))#### Branch cuts in complex inverse trig functionsatan(2)atan(2+0i)tan(atan(2+0i))## should not expect exactly 0i in resultround(atan(1.0001+0i), 7)round(atan(0.9999+0i), 7)## previously not as in Abramowitz & Stegun.## typo in z_atan2.(z <- atan2(0+1i, 0+0i))stopifnot(all.equal(z, pi/2+0i))## was NA in 2.1.1## Hyperbolicx <- seq(-3, 3, len=200)Meps <- .Machine$double.epsstopifnot(Mod(cosh(x) - cos(1i*x)) < 20*Meps,Mod(sinh(x) - sin(1i*x)/1i) < 20*Meps)## end of moved from Hyperbolic.Rd## values near and on branch cutsoptions(digits=5)z <- c(2+0i, 2-0.0001i, -2+0i, -2+0.0001i)asin(z)acos(z)atanh(z)z <- c(0+2i, 0.0001+2i, 0-2i, -0.0001i-2i)asinh(z)acosh(z)atan(z)## According to C99, should have continuity from the side given if there## are not signed zeros## Both glibc 2.12 and Mac OS X 10.6 use continuity from above in the first set## but they seem to assume signed zeros.## Windows gave incorrect (NaN) values on the cuts.## Not a regression test, but rather one of the good cases:(cNaN <- as.complex("NaN"))stopifnot(identical(cNaN, complex(re = NaN)), is.nan(Re(cNaN)), Im(cNaN) == 0)dput(cNaN) ## (real = NaN, imaginary = 0)## Partly new behavior:(c0NaN <- complex(real=0, im=NaN))(cNaNaN <- complex(re=NaN, im=NaN))stopifnot(identical(cNaN, as.complex(NaN)),identical(vapply(c(cNaN, c0NaN, cNaNaN), format, ""),c("NaN+0i", "0+NaNi", "NaN+NaNi")),identical(cNaN, NaN + 0i),identical(cNaN, Conj(cNaN)),identical(cNaN, cNaN+cNaN),identical(cNaNaN, 1i * NaN),identical(cNaNaN, complex(modulus= NaN)),identical(cNaNaN, complex(argument= NaN)),identical(cNaNaN, complex(arg=NaN, mod=NaN)),identical(c0NaN, c0NaN+c0NaN), # !## Platform dependent, not TRUE e.g. on F21 gcc 4.9.2:## identical(NA_complex_, NaN + NA_complex_ ) ,## Probably TRUE, but by a standard ??## identical(cNaNaN, 2 * c0NaN), # C-library arithmetic## identical(cNaNaN, 2 * cNaN), # C-library arithmetic## identical(cNaNaN, NA_complex_ * Inf),TRUE)