The R Project SVN R

Rev

Rev 38432 | Blame | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | Download | RSS feed

\name{Comparison}
\alias{<}
\alias{<=}
\alias{==}
\alias{!=}
\alias{>=}
\alias{>}
\alias{Comparison}
\title{Relational Operators}
\description{
  Binary operators which allow the comparison of values in atomic vectors.
}
\usage{
x < y
x > y
x <= y
x >= y
x == y
x != y
}
\arguments{
  \item{x, y}{atomic vectors, or other objects for which methods have
    been written.}
}
\details{
  The binary comparison operators are generic functions: methods can be
  written for them individually or via the
  \code{\link[base:groupGeneric]{Ops}}) group generic function.  (See
  \code{\link[base:groupGeneric]{Ops}} for how dispatch is computed.)

  Comparison of strings in character vectors is lexicographic within the
  strings using the collating sequence of the locale in use: see
  \code{\link{locales}}.  The collating sequence of locales such as
  \samp{en\_US} is normally different from \samp{C} (which should use
  ASCII) and can be surprising.

  At least one of \code{x} and \code{y} must be an atomic vector, but if
  the other is a list \R attempts to coerce it to the type of the atomic
  vector: this will succeed if the list is made up of elements of length
  one that can be coerced to the correct type.

  If the two arguments are atomic vectors of different types, one is
  coerced to the type of the other, the (decreasing) order of precedence
  being character, complex, numeric, integer, logical and raw.

  When comparisons are made between character strings, parts of the
  strings after embedded \code{nul} characters are ignored.  (This is
  necessary as the position of \code{nul} in the collation sequence is
  undefined, and we want one of \code{<}, \code{==} and \code{>} to be
  true for any comparison.)

  Missing values (\code{\link{NA}}) and \code{\link{NaN}} values are
  regarded as non-comparable even to themselves, so comparisons
  involving them will always result in \code{NA}.  Missing values can
  also result when character strings are compared and one is not valid
  in the current collation locale. 
}
\value{
  A vector of logicals indicating the result of the element by element
  comparison.  The elements of shorter vectors are recycled as
  necessary.

  Objects such as arrays or time-series can be compared this way
  provided they are conformable.
}
\note{
  Do not use \code{==} and \code{!=} for tests, such as in \code{if}
  expressions, where you must get a single \code{TRUE} or
  \code{FALSE}.  Unless you are absolutely sure that nothing unusual
  can happen, you should use the \code{\link{identical}} function
  instead.

  For numerical and complex values, remember \code{==} and \code{!=} do
  not allow for the finite representation of fractions, nor for rounding
  error. Using \code{\link{all.equal}} with \code{identical} is almost
  always preferable.  See the examples.
}
\references{
  Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M. and Wilks, A. R. (1988)
  \emph{The New S Language}.
  Wadsworth \& Brooks/Cole.
}
\seealso{
  \code{\link{factor}} for the behaviour with factor arguments.
  
  \code{\link{Syntax}} for operator precedence.
}
\examples{
x <- rnorm(20)
x < 1
x[x > 0]

x1 <- 0.5 - 0.3
x2 <- 0.3 - 0.1
x1 == x2                           # FALSE on most machines
identical(all.equal(x1, x2), TRUE) # TRUE everywhere
}
\keyword{logic}