Rev 3734 | Blame | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | Download | RSS feed
S> ### Analysis of the Semiconductor split-plot experiment, section 2.3 ofS> ### "SAS System for Mixed Models"S> options(contrasts = c(factor = "contr.SAS", ordered = "contr.poly"))S> formula( Semiconductor )resistance ~ 1 | GrpS> plot( Semiconductor )S> names( Semiconductor )[1] "resistance" "ET" "Wafer" "position" "Grp"S> plot( Semiconductor, inner = ~ position )S> fm1Semi <- lme( resistance ~ ET * position,+ data = Semiconductor,+ random = ~ 1 | Grp, method = "ML" )S> summary( fm1Semi )Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihoodData: SemiconductorAIC BIC logLik66.147 99.828 -15.073Random effects:Formula: ~ 1 | Grp(Intercept) ResidualStdDev: 0.26557 0.27221Fixed effects: resistance ~ ET * positionValue Std.Error DF t-value p-value(Intercept) 6.5400 0.26891 24 24.320 <.0001ET1 -0.6533 0.38030 8 -1.718 0.1241ET2 -0.6233 0.38030 8 -1.639 0.1398ET3 -0.4467 0.38030 8 -1.175 0.2740position1 -0.2000 0.27221 24 -0.735 0.4696position2 0.0133 0.27221 24 0.049 0.9613position3 -0.6433 0.27221 24 -2.363 0.0266ET1position1 -0.0733 0.38497 24 -0.190 0.8505ET2position1 0.2767 0.38497 24 0.719 0.4793ET3position1 0.2433 0.38497 24 0.632 0.5333ET1position2 -0.4500 0.38497 24 -1.169 0.2539ET2position2 0.2567 0.38497 24 0.667 0.5113ET3position2 0.2400 0.38497 24 0.623 0.5389ET1position3 0.3100 0.38497 24 0.805 0.4286ET2position3 0.4933 0.38497 24 1.281 0.2123ET3position3 0.3233 0.38497 24 0.840 0.4093Correlation:(Intr) ET1 ET2 ET3 postn1 postn2 postn3ET1 -0.707ET2 -0.707 0.500ET3 -0.707 0.500 0.500position1 -0.506 0.358 0.358 0.358position2 -0.506 0.358 0.358 0.358 0.500position3 -0.506 0.358 0.358 0.358 0.500 0.500ET1position1 0.358 -0.506 -0.253 -0.253 -0.707 -0.354 -0.354ET2position1 0.358 -0.253 -0.506 -0.253 -0.707 -0.354 -0.354ET3position1 0.358 -0.253 -0.253 -0.506 -0.707 -0.354 -0.354ET1position2 0.358 -0.506 -0.253 -0.253 -0.354 -0.707 -0.354ET2position2 0.358 -0.253 -0.506 -0.253 -0.354 -0.707 -0.354ET3position2 0.358 -0.253 -0.253 -0.506 -0.354 -0.707 -0.354ET1position3 0.358 -0.506 -0.253 -0.253 -0.354 -0.354 -0.707ET2position3 0.358 -0.253 -0.506 -0.253 -0.354 -0.354 -0.707ET3position3 0.358 -0.253 -0.253 -0.506 -0.354 -0.354 -0.707ET1ps1 ET2ps1 ET3ps1 ET1ps2 ET2ps2 ET3ps2 ET1ps3ET1ET2ET3position1position2position3ET1position1ET2position1 0.500ET3position1 0.500 0.500ET1position2 0.500 0.250 0.250ET2position2 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.500ET3position2 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.500 0.500ET1position3 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250ET2position3 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.500ET3position3 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.500ET2ps3ET1ET2ET3position1position2position3ET1position1ET2position1ET3position1ET1position2ET2position2ET3position2ET1position3ET2position3ET3position3 0.500Standardized Within-Group Residuals:Min Q1 Med Q3 Max-2.3406 -0.5624 0.0126 0.57402 1.6062Number of Observations: 48Number of Groups: 12S> ## check significance of the interactionS> fm2Semi <- update( fm1Semi, resistance ~ ET + position )S> fm3Semi <- update( fm1Semi, resistance ~ ET )S> fm4Semi <- update( fm1Semi, resistance ~ position )S> fm5Semi <- update( fm1Semi, resistance ~ 1 )S> anova( fm5Semi, fm4Semi, fm2Semi, fm1Semi )Model df AIC BIC logLik Test L.Ratio p-valuefm5Semi 1 3 62.373 67.987 -28.187fm4Semi 2 6 58.251 69.479 -23.126 1 vs 2 10.122 0.0176fm2Semi 3 9 57.687 74.528 -19.844 2 vs 3 6.564 0.0872fm1Semi 4 18 66.147 99.828 -15.073 3 vs 4 9.540 0.3889S> anova( fm5Semi, fm3Semi, fm2Semi, fm1Semi )Model df AIC BIC logLik Test L.Ratio p-valuefm5Semi 1 3 62.373 67.987 -28.187fm3Semi 2 6 61.809 73.036 -24.905 1 vs 2 6.564 0.0872fm2Semi 3 9 57.687 74.528 -19.844 2 vs 3 10.122 0.0176fm1Semi 4 18 66.147 99.828 -15.073 3 vs 4 9.540 0.3889S> ## AIC favors resistance ~ ET + positionS> ## BIC favors resistance ~ 1S> ## Likelihood ratio seems to favor resistance ~ position